Case no. 22-P-312, Massachusetts Appeals Court
Summary judgment reversed and request for Further Judicial Review denied by Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Issue of fact as to whether employee's firing for insider trading was a pretext and in retaliation for filing qui tam actions.
Case no. 2:16-cv-03739-ENV-AKT (E.D.N.Y. 2020)
Report and Recommendation denying damages in substantial part despite prior default.
2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97802 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 14, 2010)
Dismissed.
579 F. Supp. 2d 371 (E.D.N.Y. 2008)
Dismissed.
46 A.D.3d 366 (1st Dep’t 2007)
Defense verdict affirmed on appeal.
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52879 (S.D.N.Y. 2006); 487 F. Supp. 2d 374 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)
Settled on first day of trial.
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3648 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 2003)
Trial verdict for plaintiff. Judgment collected in full.
890 F. Supp. 269 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)
Injunction denied after full hearing. Incumbent management prevailed in proxy contest.
Copyright © 2024 Steven Altman, Esq. Commercial Trial and Business Lawyer - All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.